Multiple bills have been introduced in the congress across the United States intended to elevate the role in health care of public schemes.

Medicare for All Proposals
Student’s Name
University Affiliation

Medicare for All Proposals
Multiple bills have been introduced in the congress across the United States intended to elevate the role in health care of public schemes. These bills in a broader picture range in scope from proposals geared to creating new national health insurance initiatives for all citizens, especially residents, to enhanced perspective offering public strategy mediums on top of current coverage sources. Due to the diversity of the bills, this article delves on Medicare for all across the U.S., the acceptance and rejection, political temperatures surrounding the scheme, and alliances across the health industry concerning the plan. The program is a federal initiative encompassing comprehensive benefits for all citizens across the United States (Miller, 2019). In that regard, the republican section and multiple private health care industries are teaming up to reject the plan since it is replacing all private insurances through the covered advantages.
Political positions
Medicare-for-all has emerged as the most comprehensive proposal concerning changes to the U.S. health insurance ever introduced. According to Neuman, Karen & Jennifer (2018), this single federal government-sponsored plan, once implemented, will provide coverage for the whole citizenry of the U.S. Therefore, this means replacing virtually all alternative private health coverage and public programs thus raising the temperature across stakeholders and interested parties. Precisely, health care and promises to elevate insurance access while lowering costs animated and dominated the Democrats’ 2018 congressional campaigns (Stolberg & Robert, 2018). In that regard, lawmakers are finding themselves as they sit down to draft governance and visions hugely divided on the issue that produced majority to power. However, this category expects to overhaul the whole system and upgrade to a single government insurance plan across all Americans from the old single-payer concept.
Universally, the constantly recognized reasoning for promoting global wellness program is primarily human rights preservation originating from ethical theories concerning equity. Christopher & Dominic (2015) argue that the economic and political logarithms across the U.S. on health care being a human right dominate, discussions revolve around the apprehension between pecuniary implication regarding ubiquitous solicitude provision and free-market primacy. Therefore, political parties differ on the number of social services to offer with conservatives agitating that medical care is a commodity; hence non-disabled persons need to pocket the capacity to acquire it while liberals prospect health insurance and care acquisition as fundamental prerogative, which must be obtainable for all humans. Moreover, health care stakeholders need not be undermined since they entail a powerful influence in national dialogues on the right to health matters as acknowledged through the massive spending during ACA legislation drafting and lobbying (Christopher & Dominic, 2015). Therefore, multiple individuals utilize Medicare-for-all to establish themselves as bold progressives while republicans use it as an attack point.
Government versus private sector roles
The government’s role in healthcare has elevated influencing policies and political discourses over the years. Straube (2013) depicts that the U.S. splurge hugely on health care than the other countries globally; hence, the resulting measure of care is inferior compared to other developed nations. In that regard, the government is expected to employ extensive programs and market influence to achieve better health care value and quality. Therefore, the government plays a central role in ensuring access to quality and affordable health care among the nations’ citizenry.
On the other hand, private sectors due to the fight for market space ensure to keep the government in check thus improving care provision. Moreover, the industry pushes for the value of their money because, since the enactment of Medicare, the U.S. citizens must pay for it through mandatory salary deductions from the first paycheck until the last day an individual earns income (Dalen et al. 2019). Precisely, the private sector acts as the health care program’s engine since it services the scheme in multiple avenues.

You have not found the right essay?
Get an expert to write you the one you need!
3 hour delivery
Place an Order

Christopher, A.S. & Dominic, C. (2015). Promoting health as a human right in the post-ACA United States. AMA Journal of Ethics.
Dalen, J.E., Jennifer, L.P., Neha, J & Joseph, S.A. (2019). An alternative to Medicare for all. The American Journal for Medicine. 132(6), 665-667.
Neuman, T., Karen, P., & Jennifer, T. (2018). Medicare-for-all and public plan buy-in proposals: Overview and key issues. KFF.
Miller, M. (2019). Can We Find a Path Between Medicare for All and Building on the ACA?. The Journal of ambulatory care management, 42(3), 220-224.
Stolberg, S.G & Robert, P. (2018). Medicare for all is divisive (in the Democratic Party). The New York Times. Retrieved from:
Straube, B.M. (2013). A role of government: An observation on federal healthcare efforts in prevention. AJPM: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 44(10, S39-S42.

"Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

Get any topic done in as little as 6 hours

If yes Order Similar Paper

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

Get Assignment Writing Help

Our experts are ready to complete your assignment, course work. essay, test, dissertation, research paper, quiz

Get Started

Stuck with a Question?

Get it solved from our top experts within 8 hrs!

Ask Your Question Now!